Florida Tech 
W-L: ( 7- 2) PR = 96.4956
Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score
130 A Tampa SSC (11- 1, 99.2) 6-10
207 H Rollins SSC ( 5- 4, 96.3) 13- 9
214 H Wingate SAC ( 8- 1, 97.5) 10- 9
221 A North Greenville Carolinas ( 8- 5, 92.5) 6-12
227 H Concordia-Irvine RMAC ( 4- 5, 91.9) 14- 8
307 A Belmont Abbey Carolinas ( 9- 3, 93.3) 14- 2
313 H Flagler PBC ( 8- 4, 95.5) 9- 8
321 H Embry-Riddle SSC ( 5- 4, 94.2) 12- 8
328 A Lynn SSC ( 2- 5, 92.5) 20- 6
401 A Rollins SSC ( 5- 4, 96.3)
404 H St Leo SSC ( 6- 3, 96.0)
408 H Florida Southern SSC ( 2- 7, 92.8)
411 A Palm Beach Atlantic SSC ( 5- 6, 92.1)
415 H Tampa SSC (11- 1, 99.2)
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
130 A Tampa 6-10 -4 -3 -0.95
207 H Rollins 13- 9 4 1 + 3.39
214 H Wingate 10- 9 1 -1 1.65
221 A North Greenville 6-12 -6 4 --- -8.63
227 H Concordia-Irvine 14- 8 6 5 0.09
307 A Belmont Abbey 14- 2 12 3 + 2.16
313 H Flagler 9- 8 1 1 -0.34
321 H Embry-Riddle 12- 8 4 3 1.32
328 A Lynn 20- 6 14 4 1.34
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
221 A North Greenville 6-12 -6 4 --- -8.63
|
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
207 H Rollins 13- 9 4 1 + 3.39
307 A Belmont Abbey 14- 2 12 3 + 2.16
|
Florida Tech Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent |
Who Gets the Point?
| Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
| Adams State |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| Adelphi |
Adelphi |
|
 
| Adelphi |
| Alabama-Huntsville |
Florida Tech |
|
Florida Tech   4- 0 vs 0- 4 |
|
| American International |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Anderson (SC) |
Anderson (SC) |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) |
Anderson (SC) |
| Assumption |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Barton |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) |
Florida Tech |
| Belmont Abbey |
Florida Tech |
Florida Tech |
 
| |
| Bentley |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Bridgeport |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Caldwell |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Catawba |
Florida Tech |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Florida Tech |
| Chestnut Hill |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Chowan |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| Coker |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| Colorado Mesa |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) |
Florida Tech |
| Concordia-Irvine |
Florida Tech |
Florida Tech |
 
| |
| D'Youville |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Davenport |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Davis & Elkins |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| District of Columbia |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Dominican (CA) |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| Dominican (NY) |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Embry-Riddle |
Florida Tech |
Florida Tech |
 
| |
| Emmanuel (GA) |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) |
Florida Tech |
| Emory & Henry |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| Felician |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Flagler |
Florida Tech |
Florida Tech |
 
| |
| Florida Southern |
Florida Tech |
|
Florida Tech   3- 1 vs 0- 4 |
|
| Franklin Pierce |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Frostburg State |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Georgian Court |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Holy Family |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Indianapolis |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Lake Erie |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Lander |
Florida Tech |
|
Florida Tech   3- 1 vs 0- 4 |
|
| Lees-McRae |
Florida Tech |
|
tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| Lenoir-Rhyne |
Lenoir-Rhyne |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) |
Lenoir-Rhyne |
| Lewis |
Lewis |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) |
Lewis |
| Limestone |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Lincoln Memorial |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Lynn |
Florida Tech |
Florida Tech |
 
| |
| Malone |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Mars Hill |
Florida Tech |
|
Florida Tech   2- 1 vs 0- 3 |
|
| Maryville |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) |
Florida Tech |
| Mercy |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Molloy |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Montevallo |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 3) |
Florida Tech |
| Mount Olive |
Florida Tech |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| Newberry |
Newberry |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
Newberry |
| North Greenville |
North Greenville |
North Greenville |
 
|
| Northwood |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Pace |
Pace |
|
 
| Pace |
| Palm Beach Atlantic |
Florida Tech |
|
Florida Tech   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
| Post |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Quincy |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| Roberts Wesleyan |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Rockhurst |
Florida Tech |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| Rollins |
Florida Tech |
Florida Tech |
 
| |
| Seton Hill |
Seton Hill |
|
 
| Seton Hill |
| Shorter |
Florida Tech |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| Southern New Hampshire |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| St Anselm |
St Anselm |
|
 
| St Anselm |
| St Leo |
Florida Tech |
|
tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) |
Florida Tech |
| St Michaels |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| St Thomas Aquinas |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Tampa |
Tampa |
Tampa |
 
| |
| Thomas More |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Tiffin |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Tusculum |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| Virginia State |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Walsh |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Westminster (UT) |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| Wheeling |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| William Jewell |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Wilmington (DE) |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Wingate |
Florida Tech |
Florida Tech |
 
| |
| Young Harris |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Florida Tech |
PowerWise = 68

division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 9.19
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Tampa (11- 1, 99.2) 6-10 -0.71 21.84 0.36 1.02 -0.36
0 H Rollins ( 5- 4, 96.3) 13- 9 -3.65 18.90 -0.36 1.02 18.93
0 H Wingate ( 8- 1, 97.5) 10- 9 -2.39 20.16 -0.36 1.02 20.22
0 A North Greenvil ( 8- 5, 92.5) 6-12 -7.39 15.16 0.36 1.02 -7.18
0 H Concordia-Irvi ( 4- 5, 91.9) 14- 8 -7.95 14.60 -0.36 1.02 14.54
0 A Belmont Abbey ( 9- 3, 93.3) 14- 2 -6.60 15.95 0.36 1.02 16.66
0 H Flagler ( 8- 4, 95.5) 9- 8 -4.38 18.17 -0.36 1.02 18.18
0 H Embry-Riddle ( 5- 4, 94.2) 12- 8 -5.72 16.83 -0.36 1.02 16.82
0 A Lynn ( 2- 5, 92.5) 20- 6 -7.42 15.13 0.36 1.02 15.82
------
113.62
|
winning pts = 121.1639 losing points = -7.5394
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------